Some ideas to improve the Graphical EPG screen

[abu baniaz]

configurable menu would be better. long press of buttons to navigate is not good.

 

[darkdreamingdan]

Assuming the Primary Bouquet was the first one loaded was just part of the first commit and is no longer the case, and I had always intended to make it user-selectable. Regardless, it's disabled by default and must be opt-in.

Although if you could also have an option to number all channels in bouquet order then that would be even better (for me).

I don't know what you mean here. You turn on Channel Numbering, it shows the numbers for the relevant bouquet. This is activated by the "Service title mode" setting. In your case it would simply show the e.g. "News" bouquet if you had that open, and the channel numbers would be 130-169.

A completely separate setting is Primary Bouquet. Here's how it might work for you:

• You set Primary Bouquet to "HD"
• You open Graphical EPG for "News" bouquet
• Where applicable, channel numbers are replaced with those from HD within the EPG. E.g. BBC News HD shows as 1xx instead of 3xx.
• No changes are made to actual channel numbers, just how they're perceived in EPG.

In your case, it makes sense to just leave Primary Bouquet off and not worry about it. You may want to turn on Channel numbering however.

Just checked and as it currently stands it looks like this has been replaced by zapping to a channel entered via number buttons.

I see two possible options here. Add a menu setting to enable zap to channel from epg as a yes/no. Choosing No obviously would keep original number key function in tact.

The other option is, and here I couldn't help, but is it possible to have original numbering key on long presses instead? If possible, @Abu Baniaz, do you think this would be a possible solution?

In my mind there's only one possible option: the former. We must provide an option, and have previous behaviour by default, if we expect the Vix team to merge this without fear of backlash. I think that's completely fair. The same goes for scrolling by channel numbers. Adding an option seems like a simple add to me.

I'll work with ketmp to try and get everything needed to meet everyone's requirements.


In the mean time, bootloop crash on my tree should now be fixed. As always:

https://github.com/darkdreamingdan/enigma2/archive/Dev.zip (to ensure they're the latest files)

Relevant files (install over my previous .zip with skin mods):
data/setup.xml -> usr/share/enigma2/setup.xml
lib/python/Components/EpgList.py -> usr/lib/enigma2/python/Components/EpgList.py
lib/python/Components/UsageConfig.py -> usr/lib/enigma2/python/Components/UsageConfig.py
lib/python/Screens/EpgSelection.py -> usr/lib/enigma2/python/Screens/EpgSelection.py
lib/python/Screens/InfoBar.py -> usr/lib/enigma2/python/Screens/InfoBar.py

 

[birdman]

A completely separate setting is Primary Bouquet. Here's how it might work for you:

• You set Primary Bouquet to "HD"
• You open Graphical EPG for "News" bouquet
• Where applicable, channel numbers are replaced with those from HD within the EPG. E.g. BBC News HD shows as 1xx instead of 3xx.
• No changes are made to actual channel numbers, just how they're perceived in EPG.

But each channel in my set-up only ever appears in one bouquet.

You may want to turn on Channel numbering however.

Well, I might - but it's only going to do something useful for me if it can find a list of all channels - which I don't have in a single bouquet anywhere. Hence the suggestion that this list could be obtained from a bouquet file on the file system rather than a used bouquet, as to make it a bouquet it would have to be the first (to get the right numbers for Freeview) and then all of the sub-sections I have set-up would be wrong.
Bear in mind that Freeview is the only provider I have, and it does have "defined" channels for each service.

 

[abu baniaz]

Unless alternate numbering is on
The way E2 works with regards to "numbering" is the numbers are cumulative. If there are no repeats and there are relevant place holders, the numbers will tally. There is no need to use any bouquet for numbering. On the other hand, where there is large first bouquet (encompassing the sections), the "channel number" in the subsequent bouquet will be the cumulative one. Depending on whether someone has not indexed on or not, will affect the "channel number" of the first channel in the enertainment bouquet.

For satellite, if the first bouquet is HD only/HD First, i.e only 1-100 are occupied, the first channel in the Entertainment bouquet will still be 101 and the rest will also tally. For Terrestrail, there is no space in 1-100, so any option other than "no" for the forst bouquet will throw things out of sync.

As E2 splits the services between TV and Radio and usually omits the data ones, this complicates maters. The Neutrino mode does things differently.

The Info Bar displays the chanenl number from the current bouquet. This is why it was simple and added. When you press the EPG button, or open the bouquets, you will be presented the bouquet from which the channel was selected. This is easy where the cumulative number is the same as there are no duplicates.

Now, if we have the large first bouquet, things start getting complicated.
Navigate to the Sports bouquet. Select a channel. When you open the bouquets or press EPG, you will still be in the Sports bouquet because this is where you selected it from. However, if you key in 413, you will be taken to 413 in the cumulative "numbering system". If you now press TV or EPG, you will open up the the large first bouquet.

This is easy for those just using 28.2 and images that support place holders.

Not the very experienced with this, so I would be grateful for any corrections.

 

[Huevos]

This thread has got very mixed up. People need to start their own threads to avoid this.

There is no intention to reassign any buttons. Not sure why people are trying to reinvent the wheel.

Channel numbers in the G-EPG would be a nice optional edition, if, and only if, it follows E2's channel numbering. i.e. numbering additive from channel 1 in first bouquet, or if alternative numbering is on, numbering from 1 in the current bouquet.

 

[rossi2000]

I agree. I was working of a mixture of previous amendments that had been done in this thread.

I'm sure it's prudent to only introduce one thing at a time. Maybe if you get yours working and signed off and if ok with powers that be, it gets released into Vix and if no problems we then introduce my customisation. I think merging both at same time would leave us with problems.

What do mods/admin think to this?

this is a good way imo

 

[darkdreamingdan]

Hey guys

Thanks for abu baniaz for help testing. I have submitted a GitHub pull request to the team to merge this into the main development tree directly - should be just a button click away from being merged. It includes support for Channel Numbers and Primary Bouquet for 28.2 users.

https://github.com/OpenViX/enigma2/pull/22

Manual installation provided at the bottom of the page.

But each channel in my set-up only ever appears in one bouquet.

Well, I might - but it's only going to do something useful for me if it can find a list of all channels - which I don't have in a single bouquet anywhere. Hence the suggestion that this list could be obtained from a bouquet file on the file system rather than a used bouquet, as to make it a bouquet it would have to be the first (to get the right numbers for Freeview) and then all of the sub-sections I have set-up would be wrong.
Bear in mind that Freeview is the only provider I have, and it does have "defined" channels for each service.

After reading this a few times, I finally understand the point you're making here. Unfortunately, it doesn't really apply to my use case so I had no interest in implementing it for myself. However, I do feel like the channel numbering has always been a lingering issue in E2 and had investigated a way to improve things. If there's some demand for it (more than just yourself), i'd be interested in coming with a universal solution that would be useful for all users, rather than the very 28.2-centric Primary Bouquet feature I created now.

My next job is to create a pull request for customisable keys for the Graphical EPG. I'm hoping providing no defaults are changed, and that everything is stable, that Vix will be willing to pull these as well. It'll provide some button customisation support to cater for the 27 pages and poll-winning 28.2 users who dislike the current layout.

MANUAL INSTALLATION:

SANS MATT007/BBBUK EPG BUTTON LAYOUT CUSTOMISATION
https://github.com/darkdreamingdan/enigma2/archive/Dev.zip

data/setup.xml -> usr/share/enigma2/setup.xml
lib/python/Components/EpgList.py -> usr/lib/enigma2/python/Components/EpgList.py
lib/python/Components/UsageConfig.py -> usr/lib/enigma2/python/Components/UsageConfig.py
lib/python/Screens/EpgSelection.py -> usr/lib/enigma2/python/Screens/EpgSelection.py
lib/python/Screens/InfoBar.py -> usr/lib/enigma2/python/Screens/InfoBar.py

WITH MATT007/BBBUK EPG BUTTON LAYOUT CUSTOMISATION
https://github.com/darkdreamingdan/enigma2/archive/98f5eb406f66e4012bbe4a3a432cddce58452ddf.zip

Relevant files (install over previous .zip with skin mods http://www.world-of-satellite.com/attachment.php?attachmentid=45055&d=1444608948):
data/setup.xml -> usr/share/enigma2/setup.xml
lib/python/Components/EpgList.py -> usr/lib/enigma2/python/Components/EpgList.py
lib/python/Components/UsageConfig.py -> usr/lib/enigma2/python/Components/UsageConfig.py
lib/python/Screens/EpgSelection.py -> usr/lib/enigma2/python/Screens/EpgSelection.py
lib/python/Screens/InfoBar.py -> usr/lib/enigma2/python/Screens/InfoBar.py

 

[abu baniaz]

You don't need to worry about Birdman's scenario. His numbers should work just fine.

 

[birdman]

You dont need to worry about Birdman's senario. His numbers should work just fine.

True.
I was just presenting my set-up as a situation that was probably a different scenario (one provider with provider-defined channel numbers).
I can (and do) switch to channels using their channel number at the moment - but have no wish to do that from within the EPG. The only thing which would interest me would be to display these numbers in the EPG. I did once do something to the Graphical EPG which put the number sin there, but they took up so much space that the rest of the display (the channel name?) was adversely affected, so I removed them.

 

[abu baniaz]

For the time being, those wishing to add the numbers to Graphical EPG, these are the files needed. Extract and transfer the whole "usr" folder.

 

[Rob van der Does]

I have submitted a GitHub pull request to the team to merge this into the main development tree directly

Thanks: I merged it, so we can test it in our dev-images the next couple of days.

 

[abu baniaz]

I have tested this. From my tests, I could not find a fault with it. No existing code was broken. I tested with alternate numbering on and off with several providers.

 

[Sicilian]

Guys, for now the merge has been temp reverted. We'd like to fully test this files posted.

OpenViX is for more than only 28.2. We need to look at how this affects all our users, not only our users using Astra 28.2.

 

[abu baniaz]

Does this file contain all the changes?

For now the merge has been temp reverted.

Yes all the changes.

Tested with alternate numbering on and off. Using three providers in ABM. Using differnt the "primary bouquets". E2 numbering still adhered to. Just to be thorough, I made Sky Uk as the second provider. The existing behaviour of E2 numbering was fully respected. I deliberately selected the wrong bouquet as the primary bouquet, still adhered to.

Obviously one person's tests cannot encompass all eventualities and is limited. On the flip side, people wanting to reject something will always find a reason.

 

[darkdreamingdan]

Guys, for now the merge has been temp reverted. We'd like to fully test this files posted.

OpenViX is for more than only 28.2. We need to look at how this affects all our users, not only our users using Astra 28.2.

Correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't the whole point in the Dev branch to allow things to be tested - then it gets pushed the master? How can something be tested if there are no official builds for it. Fair enough if it's more about reviewing the code before merging though.

Cheers

 

[tappari]

Sorry to intrude to this conversation even never reading the posts. But I have to tell you one thing. Testing so many images in my boxes, the reason to come back to ViX is always the same. Excellent graphical epg. My favourite skin is Magic-HD-Noire

 

[Rob van der Does]

Correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't the whole point in the Dev branch to allow things to be tested - then it gets pushed the master?

Yes it is. That's also one of the reasons that commits have to be about one, preferably small, specific issue.

 

[Sicilian]

Guys, I've only just started looking at this, due to real life I've not been able to follow this whole thread.

This does not work with all scenarios or for all users.

This is a brief outline of my test.

Fresh flash of Build 015.

Tested as follows:

1) Installed Vhanniabals Motor settings.
2) Setup ABM with FreeSat, Sky UK and Tivusat to remain at top of bouquets.

Transferred the files posted, rebooted, enabled the modifications.

Look at my screenshots, channel numbers in epg are screwed.

Would never work for the setup I've just posted.

For this mod to be considered for integration it needs to work for all scenario's, not only Sky UK, unless I've missed something, if so please feel free to point it out.

 

[darkdreamingdan]

Guys, I've only just started looking at this, due to real life I've not been able to follow this whole thread.

This does not work with all scenarios or for all users.

This is a brief outline of my test.

Fresh flash of Build 015.

Tested as follows:

1) Installed Vhanniabals Motor settings.
2) Setup ABM with FreeSat, Sky UK and Tivusat to remain at top of bouquets.

Transferred the files posted, rebooted, enabled the modifications.

Look at my screenshots, channel numbers in epg are screwed.

Would never work for the setup I've just posted.

For this mod to be considered for integration it needs to work for all scenario's, not only Sky UK, unless I've missed something, if so please feel free to point it out.

Could you try again, setting "Use Primary Bouquet for Channel Numbers" to "Disabled". I think this is the desired behavior for your configuration. If it doesn't would appreciate screenshots of this scenario (if different). Will look into fixing if so.

 

[Sicilian]

Could you try again, setting "Use Primary Bouquet for Channel Numbers" to "Disabled". I think this is the desired behavior for your configuration. If it doesn't would appreciate screenshots of this scenario (if different). Will look into fixing if so.

Tried that, yes corrected my issue and tested more. I'll be honest, don't think we'd consider adding that part.

Can you please post links to the code required for Channel numbers only in bouquets only and we'll take a look. Thanks.