I changed the time setting to sync with NTP and soon discovered that while in Deep Standby the system clock ... stops! So recordings are missed altogether. As soon as I restart the box manually the clock starts again but it won't jump to present time. Consequently, the clock is lagging by how long I left it in Deep Standby. More about this below, but first let me share a recent finding pertinent to the problem at hand:
While experimenting I discovered this behaviour which may be of importance. If I set a timer which is due to start soon, say within the next 10 minutes and place the box in Deep Standby, I get a warning that recordings are imminent. I proceed and place the box in Deep Standby regardless. Well, when it wakes up in a few minutes following such a warning, the box behaves as expected and the "[Navigation] RECTIMER: wakeup to standby detected." is present in the logs. If I set up a timer sometime longer in the future whereby I do not receive a warning when I place it in Deep Standby, the box misbehaves as per my original report.
Regarding the NTP problem, I thought initially the ntp server may be busy so I tried my local router's ntp server using its IP address, then tried 0.pool.ntp.org, 3.uk.pool.ntp.org and all failed to make the box keep up with, or adjust to present time. I haven't noticed such problems when using the transponder to set the system clock. The logs show E2 is obtaining the time from the network NTP server, but it is not drifting to adjust it forward:
< 1854.770> [Console] command: /usr/bin/ntpdate-sync
< 1854.770> [eConsoleAppContainer] Starting /bin/sh
< 1862.919> [Console] finished: /usr/bin/ntpdate-sync
< 1862.920> [NetworkTime] setting E2 time: 1533395566.92
[snip ...]
< 3662.921> [Console] command: /usr/bin/ntpdate-sync
< 3662.921> [eConsoleAppContainer] Starting /bin/sh
< 3671.057> [Console] finished: /usr/bin/ntpdate-sync
< 3671.058> [NetworkTime] setting E2 time: 1533397375.06
but Mut@nt's syslog reports:
Aug 4 18:24:40 mutant51 daemon.err ntpdate[3979]: no server suitable for synchronization found
Aug 4 18:25:16 mutant51 daemon.err ntpdate[4005]: no server suitable for synchronization found
Aug 4 18:26:53 mutant51 daemon.err ntpdate[4064]: no server suitable for synchronization found
despite the fact my router (10.10.10.1) reports synchronisation packets are received from and returned to the Mut@nt (10.10.10.9):
18:30:18: receive: at 5982693 10.10.10.1<-10.10.10.9 VRF: -DEFAULT- flags 1 restrict 000
18:30:18: MRU: interval 101 headway 8 limit 64
18:30:18: receive: at 5982693 10.10.10.1<-10.10.10.9 mode 3/client:AM_FXMIT len 48 org 0000000000.00000000 xmt 0xdf1060c0.2a4c5fc4 NOMAC
18:30:18: sendpkt(38, dst=10.10.10.9, src=10.10.10.1, ttl=0, len=48)
18:30:18: fast_xmit: at 5982693 10.10.10.1->10.10.10.9 mode 4 len 48
18:30:20: receive: at 5982695 10.10.10.1<-10.10.10.9 VRF: -DEFAULT- flags 1 restrict 000
18:30:20: MRU: interval 2 headway 12 limit 64
18:30:20: receive: at 5982695 10.10.10.1<-10.10.10.9 mode 3/client:AM_FXMIT len 48 org 0000000000.00000000 xmt 0xdf1060c2.2a4a9e7d NOMAC
18:30:20: sendpkt(38, dst=10.10.10.9, src=10.10.10.1, ttl=0, len=48)
18:30:20: fast_xmit: at 5982695 10.10.10.1->10.10.10.9 mode 4 len 48
18:30:22: receive: at 5982697 10.10.10.1<-10.10.10.9 VRF: -DEFAULT- flags 1 restrict 000
18:30:22: MRU: interval 2 headway 16 limit 64
18:30:22: receive: at 5982697 10.10.10.1<-10.10.10.9 mode 3/client:AM_FXMIT len 48 org 0000000000.00000000 xmt 0xdf1060c4.2a4a5f16 NOMAC
18:30:22: sendpkt(38, dst=10.10.10.9, src=10.10.10.1, ttl=0, len=48)
18:30:22: fast_xmit: at 5982697 10.10.10.1->10.10.10.9 mode 4 len 48
18:30:24: receive: at 5982699 10.10.10.1<-10.10.10.9 VRF: -DEFAULT- flags 1 restrict 000
18:30:24: MRU: interval 2 headway 20 limit 64
18:30:24: receive: at 5982699 10.10.10.1<-10.10.10.9 mode 3/client:AM_FXMIT len 48 org 0000000000.00000000 xmt 0xdf1060c6.2a4abffe NOMAC
18:30:24: sendpkt(38, dst=10.10.10.9, src=10.10.10.1, ttl=0, len=48)
18:30:24: fast_xmit: at 5982699 10.10.10.1->10.10.10.9 mode 4 len 48
Is this another bug, or is there something missing from my settings?