Superb quality and spec AB-Com PULSe 4K SE. Crazy offer! Only £129! FREE UK DELIVERY! 4K UHD, Enigma 2, Multiboot 4 images & more!...
Superb quality and spec AB-Com PULSe 4K Rev II Twin Satellite tuner only £179! FREE UK DELIVERY! 4K UHD, Enigma 2, SATA HDD facility, Multiboot 4 images & more!...

New skin: Simple Ten Eighty

From what I can see on the LCD display the skin_display file seems to have turned out perfectly, but I just don't understand why it was necessary to link the skin_display file to the skin_display_picon file I'm sure there are users who want to customize the skin_display_picon file themselves, so why link it so that it would be impossible to edit one file without the other ? Now the second step of the job is waiting: how to redesign the skin_display_picon file, since the LCD display should be look like a real icon
 

Attachments

  • 0012.webp
    0012.webp
    9.2 KB · Views: 11
  • 0014.webp
    0014.webp
    9 KB · Views: 3
  • lcdshot_20261106133951.webp
    lcdshot_20261106133951.webp
    5.2 KB · Views: 3
There are just a handful of screens that show picon. The rest of the screens come from skin_display.xml. There is no point duplicating loads of stuff.
 
Please tell me, how can I prevent the .png icons from the skin_display.xml file (progressbar.png and sprogress.png) from being duplicated to the file skin_display_picon.xml file? Do I really need to first unlink the skin_display.xml file from the skin_display_picon.xml file? I would be very grateful for your reply!
 

OpenViX Feeds Status

Back
Top