Superb quality and spec AB-Com PULSe 4K SE. Crazy offer! Only £129! FREE UK DELIVERY! 4K UHD, Enigma 2, Multiboot 4 images & more!...
Superb quality and spec AB-Com PULSe 4K Rev II Twin Satellite tuner only £179! FREE UK DELIVERY! 4K UHD, Enigma 2, SATA HDD facility, Multiboot 4 images & more!...

[VU+ Solo2] Crashing everyday

Code:
<  1565.7418> 07:07:06.7340   File "/usr/lib/enigma2/python/Plugins/Extensions/XStreamity/plugin.py", line 156, in main
<  1565.7492> 07:07:06.7414     
<  1565.7494> 07:07:06.7415   File "/usr/lib/enigma2/python/Plugins/Extensions/XStreamity/mainmenu.py", line 6, in <module>
<  1565.7512> 07:07:06.7434     from . import processfiles as xfiles
<  1565.7513> 07:07:06.7435   File "/usr/lib/enigma2/python/Plugins/Extensions/XStreamity/processfiles.py", line 2, in <module>
<  1565.7534> 07:07:06.7456     from .plugin import playlists_json, playlist_file, cfg
<  1565.7536> 07:07:06.7458 ImportError: cannot import name 'playlists_json' from 'Plugins.Extensions.XStreamity.plugin' (/usr/lib/enigma2/python/Plugins/Extensions/XStreamity/plugin.py)
<  1565.7538> 07:07:06.7460 [ePyObject] (CallObject(<bound method ActionMap.action of <Components.ActionMap.ActionMap object at 0x71c79ac0>>,('WizardActions', 'ok')) failed)
 
Looks like it should be Py3 compliant ....

Code:
https://github.com/oe-alliance/oe-alliance-core/pull/623
 
Have you installed an old downloaded version of the plugin or from the plugin server on image? If you have used plugin server, try downloading latest ipk from the other forum he mainly uses.

Both those plugins are python 3 compliant. He accepts pull requests for any fixes people want to submit.
 
Looks like it should be Py3 compliant ....

Code:
https://github.com/oe-alliance/oe-alliance-core/pull/623

Yes. And the error message actually mentions "from .plugin import", so my original thought was incorrect.
 
There is something odd happening here.
The error report mentions:
Code:
<  1565.7418> 07:07:06.7340   File "/usr/lib/enigma2/python/Plugins/Extensions/XStreamity/plugin.py", line 156, in main[COLOR=#ff0000]
<  1565.7492> 07:07:06.7414[/COLOR]
<  1565.7494> 07:07:06.7415   File "/usr/lib/enigma2/python/Plugins/Extensions/XStreamity/mainmenu.py", line 6, in <module>
...
i.e. it reckons that line 156 is empty.
And indeed, it is.
So why is it mentioned in the traceback?

Is JEDI MAKER XTREAM playing mind-games with XStreamity?
 
Last edited:
The versions available on plugin server are built from Kiddac's repository. As we no longer build ~fortnightly/regular release images, there is a lag between fixes on any plugin built from .bb file and it being available on plugin server. Best to await for confirmation as to which version OP is using or inspect code on GitHub directly.

https://github.com/kiddac/Jedi_Maker_Xtream
https://github.com/kiddac/XStreamity
 
Last edited:
There is something odd happening here.
The error report mentions:
Code:
<  1565.7418> 07:07:06.7340   File "/usr/lib/enigma2/python/Plugins/Extensions/XStreamity/plugin.py", line 156, in main[COLOR=#ff0000]
<  1565.7492> 07:07:06.7414[/COLOR]
<  1565.7494> 07:07:06.7415   File "/usr/lib/enigma2/python/Plugins/Extensions/XStreamity/mainmenu.py", line 6, in <module>
...
i.e. it reckons that line 156 is empty.
And indeed, it is.
So why is it mentioned in the traceback?

Is JEDI MAKER XTREAM playing mind-games with XStreamity?
2 different (Kiddac) plugins and config files go in different directories in /etc/enigma
 
The versions available on plugin server are built from Kiddac's repository. As we no longer build ~fortnightly/regular release images, there is a lag between fixes on any plugin built from .bb file and it being available on plugin server. Best to await for confirmation as to which version OP is using or inspect code on GitHub directly.

https://github.com/kiddac/Jedi_Maker_Xtream
https://github.com/kiddac/XStreamity


I use Xstreamity all the time & current version has no issues as far as I have found
 
2 different (Kiddac) plugins and config files go in different directories in /etc/enigma
I was using the one from the feeds.
I've just looked on Kiddac's git. Line 156 is empty.

And the relevant thing is that the python on the OPs box reckons that it's empty there as well.
 
we no longer build ~fortnightly/regular release images
Did we ever? When I came to ViX I remember my changes taking months to get into the public image.

In 2021 there were 16 releases. Better 16 stable releases then shipping every bug in a nightly build.

And BTW, it takes more than 2 weeks to do a full build (now we have nodejs/qt/stalker/kodi/etc, locking the build up for hours).

Other teams obviously have a bank of build servers. We have to work within our resources. We are not propped up by or at the demands of the manufacturers. Our users come first.
 

OpenViX Feeds Status

Back
Top